Mutual agreement procedure (MAP)

Also called: MAP · Competent authority procedure

A treaty mechanism through which two tax authorities negotiate to resolve taxation not in accordance with the treaty, including double taxation from transfer pricing adjustments.

5 min read · Last reviewed 2026-06-30

In one line

Under the OECD Model Tax Convention, Article 25 (OECD, 2017): A treaty mechanism through which two tax authorities negotiate to resolve taxation not in accordance with the treaty, including double taxation from transfer pricing adjustments.

Source status: Primary source · OECD Model Tax Convention, Article 25

Key facts

Key facts about Mutual agreement procedure (MAP)
TermMutual agreement procedure (MAP)
Also calledMAP; Competent authority procedure
Primary authorityOECD Model Tax Convention, Article 25 (OECD, 2017)
Source statusPrimary source
TopicsControversy & certainty
Most relevant toIn-house tax teams; Advisors & consultants
Most common audit triggerTreaty without an Article 25(5) arbitration clause on a large case.
Who owns it internallyGroup tax controversy lead, working with competent authority.
Last reviewed2026-06-30

Plain English

When two countries both tax the same profit, you can ask them to sort it out between themselves. You are not a party to the negotiation — your competent authority argues on your behalf. It is slow, but it is usually the only route to full relief.

Technical definition

Article 25 of the OECD Model permits a person to present a case to the competent authority of either contracting state where actions of one or both states result or will result in taxation not in accordance with the Convention, and requires the authorities to endeavour to resolve the case by mutual agreement.

Why it matters

It is the principal cure for double taxation and, under the BEPS Action 14 minimum standard, jurisdictions have committed to resolving cases within an average of 24 months.

How it works in practice

  1. 01File the MAP request within the treaty time limit, generally three years from first notification.
  2. 02Provide the same factual position to both authorities.
  3. 03Authorities exchange position papers and negotiate.
  4. 04Agreement is implemented through corresponding adjustment; some treaties add mandatory binding arbitration if no agreement is reached.

Worked example

Protecting the clock

An adjustment is proposed in year one but domestic appeal is expected to run for four years. Filing the MAP request immediately, in parallel with the appeal, preserves treaty access. Waiting for the appeal to conclude can put the case outside the three-year window and forfeit relief entirely.

Common mistakes

  • Filing late.
  • Presenting inconsistent facts in the two jurisdictions.
  • Signing a domestic settlement that bars subsequent MAP access.

Audit red flags

  • Treaty without an Article 25(5) arbitration clause on a large case.
  • Counterparty jurisdiction with long MAP inventory times.

Documentation & data

Documents to hold

  • MAP request and position paper.
  • Audit history and adjustment notices.
  • Original transfer pricing documentation.

Data you need

  • Full audit record.
  • Treaty text and any MLI modifications.
  • Statute of limitation dates in both states.

Who owns this internally: Group tax controversy lead, working with competent authority.

Jurisdiction notes

European Union
The Tax Dispute Resolution Directive adds enforceable deadlines and arbitration for EU-EU disputes.
Global
The OECD publishes annual MAP statistics by jurisdiction; review them before choosing MAP over domestic remedies.

Notes by role

Advisors & consultants

Advise clients to file protectively as soon as an adjustment is proposed. It costs little and preserves everything.

Frequently asked

Does MAP guarantee relief?
No. Authorities must endeavour to reach agreement; only mandatory binding arbitration, where available, guarantees an outcome.

Sources & status

  • Primary source

    OECD Model Tax Convention, Article 25

    OECD, 2017

  • Primary source

    BEPS Action 14 Minimum Standard

    OECD, 2015

Reference material only, not advice on a specific fact pattern. Reviewed 2026-06-30.

Careers

How this shows up in the job

MAP experience is rare and prized. If your team has a live case, ask to help with the position paper.

Careers in transfer pricing

Book a TP Health Check

Unsure how Mutual agreement procedure (MAP) holds up in your structure?

A fixed-scope review of your intercompany pricing, documentation and audit exposure — scoped to your jurisdictions, delivered as a written risk memo. First response within one business day.