Intercompany loan in Transfer Pricing

Also called: Related-party loan · Intra-group loan

A loan between two members of the same group, which must carry an arm's length interest rate and reflect genuine debt characteristics.

6 min read · Last reviewed 2026-06-30

In one line

Under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, Chapter X, paras 10.1–10.93 (OECD, 2022): A loan between two members of the same group, which must carry an arm's length interest rate and reflect genuine debt characteristics.

Source status: Primary source · OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, Chapter X, paras 10.1–10.93

Key facts

Key facts about Intercompany loan
TermIntercompany loan
Also calledRelated-party loan; Intra-group loan
Primary authorityOECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, Chapter X, paras 10.1–10.93 (OECD, 2022)
Source statusPrimary source
TopicsFinancial transactions; Intangibles & financing
Most relevant toIn-house tax teams; Advisors & consultants; CFOs & finance leaders
Most common audit triggerInterest rate unchanged for years despite deteriorating borrower financials.
Who owns it internallyGroup treasury structures the loan; tax sets and defends the pricing; both sign off on documentation before drawdown.
Last reviewed2026-06-30

Plain English

When one group company lends money to another, tax authorities want to see the same discipline an outside bank would apply: a credit assessment, a rate that reflects the borrower's risk, and terms that make commercial sense. Groups sometimes treat these loans casually — round numbers, no term sheet, interest set once and never revisited — and that casualness is exactly what attracts scrutiny, because interest is deductible and moves profit between countries.

Technical definition

An intercompany loan is a financial transaction between associated enterprises within the meaning of Article 9 of the OECD Model, subject to accurate delineation under Chapter I Section D.1 and specific guidance under Chapter X paragraphs 10.1–10.93, requiring assessment of the loan's economically relevant characteristics — amount, term, seniority, currency, financial covenants and the borrower's creditworthiness — to determine an arm's length interest rate.

Why it matters

Interest is a deductible expense that moves cash directly out of the paying jurisdiction's tax base; it is one of the most frequently adjusted items in transfer pricing audits and increasingly interacts with thin capitalisation and interest limitation rules.

How it works in practice

  1. 01Delineate the instrument: confirm it behaves as debt (repayment expectation, interest obligation, no equity-like features).
  2. 02Assess the borrower's standalone credit rating using financial ratios and/or rating agency methodology.
  3. 03Decide whether and how much implicit group support to layer onto the standalone rating.
  4. 04Select a method — typically CUP using comparable bond or loan data — to derive an arm's length rate.
  5. 05Document the loan agreement with commercial terms consistent with the pricing.

Worked example

Five-year unsecured loan, USD 20m

A US parent lends USD 20m to its Brazilian subsidiary for five years, unsecured. The subsidiary's standalone rating is assessed at B+; with one notch of implicit group uplift it reaches BB-. Comparable USD-denominated corporate bonds of BB- issuers with similar tenor trade at a yield of 6.8%. The loan is priced at SOFR + 350bps, equating to roughly 6.9%, within the arm's length range. Pricing it at the parent's own AA- cost of funds plus a nominal 50bps margin would have understated the rate by over 250bps.

Common mistakes

  • Pricing the loan off the lender's cost of funds instead of the borrower's credit risk.
  • Never revisiting the rate as the borrower's financial position changes over the loan term.
  • Ignoring currency mismatch between the loan and the borrower's functional currency.
  • Failing to give full uplift-free effect to genuine standalone weakness before considering group support.

Audit red flags

  • Interest rate unchanged for years despite deteriorating borrower financials.
  • No loan agreement or one signed long after funds were advanced.
  • Loan classified as debt for tax purposes but with equity-like features (no fixed maturity, subordination, interest contingent on profits).

Documentation & data

Documents to hold

  • Signed loan agreement with commercial terms.
  • Credit rating analysis, standalone and group-supported.
  • Benchmarking study of comparable loans or bonds.
  • Board approval and evidence of the funds' actual use.

Data you need

  • Borrower's financial statements and forecasts.
  • Comparable loan or bond market data.
  • Group credit rating and public debt terms, if any.

Who owns this internally: Group treasury structures the loan; tax sets and defends the pricing; both sign off on documentation before drawdown.

Jurisdiction notes

United States
Treas. Reg. §1.482-2(a) requires an arm's length rate of interest and provides safe-harbour ranges tied to the applicable federal rate in some circumstances.
OECD/EU
Chapter X and most EU member state guidance require full credit rating and comparability analysis rather than a fixed safe harbour.
India
Rules under Section 92 require benchmarking against comparable uncontrolled loans, with CBDT guidance on acceptable rate bases for foreign-currency loans.

Notes by role

CFOs & finance leaders

The interest rate you choose directly affects both entities' cash tax; getting it wrong risks double taxation if only one side is adjusted.

Advisors & consultants

The credit rating step is usually where cases are won or lost — challenge both the standalone rating methodology and the size of any support uplift.

Frequently asked

Can the interest rate be a flat group-wide rate?
No. Chapter X requires the rate to reflect the specific borrower's risk profile, not a uniform group rate.
What if the loan has no fixed repayment date?
It may be recharacterised as equity or a different instrument entirely if it lacks genuine debt features.

Sources & status

  • Primary source

    OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, Chapter X, paras 10.1–10.93

    OECD, 2022

  • Primary source

    Treas. Reg. §1.482-2(a)

    US Treasury, 2023

Reference material only, not advice on a specific fact pattern. Reviewed 2026-06-30.

Careers

How this shows up in the job

Intercompany loans are the most common financial transaction case study in transfer pricing interviews — know the delineation-then-rating-then-method sequence cold.

Careers in transfer pricing

Book a TP Health Check

Unsure how Intercompany loan holds up in your structure?

A fixed-scope review of your intercompany pricing, documentation and audit exposure — scoped to your jurisdictions, delivered as a written risk memo. First response within one business day.